The Atlantic Daily
The former president’s desperation could drive his actions even after the final votes are cast.
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.
“Trump, enraged and rattled, is reverting to his feral ways,” Peter Wehner wrote in The Atlantic today. Among those is Trump’s insistence on refusing reality: This weekend, the former president pushed a bizarre conspiracy theory that the massive crowds at recent rallies for Kamala Harris were faked by AI.
Apparently suffering from a severe case of crowd envy, Trump seized on right-wing social-media speculation and claimed that “NOBODY” had really shown up at Harris’s rallies. Despite extensive photographic evidence that thousands of supporters had turned out at an airport in Detroit, Trump insisted that the crowds “DIDN’T EXIST.” In fact, he declared, “there was nobody there,” and cited as evidence “the reflection of the mirror like finish on the Vice Presidential Plane,” which did not reflect images of the crowd that was otherwise in plain sight.
Trump’s claims were pathetically easy to debunk. His rally-crowd lie is yet another of his denials of the truth in front of him. But it was also a warning of a different sort: The former president is openly laying the groundwork for challenging the legitimacy of the November election.
After claiming that Harris had “CHEATED at the airport,” Trump telegraphed his other message: “This is the way the Democrats win Elections, by CHEATING – And they’re even worse at the Ballot Box.” Trump has been workshopping his claims that Harris’s candidacy is illegitimate; he has already suggested that the replacement of Joe Biden with Harris was somehow “unconstitutional.” (It wasn’t, because the Constitution is silent on party nominations.) In his weekend rant, Trump suggested that Harris “should be disqualified because the creation of a fake image is ELECTION INTERFERENCE. Anyone who does that will cheat at ANYTHING!”
In the 2020 race, Trump used the lie that the election had been stolen to incite a violent attack on the nation’s Capitol; now he and his allies have the added advantage of an infrastructure for sowing chaos the next time around. One of Trump’s campaign managers, Chris LaCivita, has already made it clear that Trump may fight the outcome of the election long after November 5. “It’s not over until he puts his hand on the Bible and takes the oath,” LaCivita said in a recent interview with Politico at the Republican National Convention. “It’s not over on Election Day, it’s over on Inauguration Day.” An investigation by Rolling Stone last month found that nearly 70 pro-Trump election deniers serve as election officials in key battleground counties.
In Georgia, Trump supporters on the state election board have adopted rules requiring “reasonable inquiry” before election results are certified, a move that could give GOP county-election-board members the ability to reject the 2024 election’s outcome. And as The Guardian reports, the lawyer and Trump ally Cleta Mitchell “has spent the last few years building up a network of activists focused on local boards of elections.” At the national level, the Republican National Committee says that it hopes to mobilize 100,000 volunteers, including thousands of poll watchers, to focus on “Democrat attempts to circumvent the rules.” Meanwhile, one RNC senior counsel for election integrity, Christina Bobb, was criminally indicted earlier this year for her role in trying to overturn the 2020 election (she pleaded not guilty).
Then there is the mood of the MAGA base. Trump’s lies about the 2020 election have become a litmus test in the GOP, and a recent Pew Research Center poll found that although 77 percent of Democratic voters believe that the election will be conducted “fairly and accurately,” less than half of Republican voters have faith in the system. Despite Harris’s recent surge, the majority of Trump supporters are confident that he will be victorious. (A recent YouGov poll found that nearly eight in 10 Trump supporters think he would win if pitted against Harris.) Trump fully intends to stoke his supporters’ disbelief and anger at the possibility that he could lose. As Wehner warned recently: “If you have friends who are Trump worshippers, a word of counsel: They’re heading to a very dark place psychologically … They felt this race was won; now it’s slipping away. Expect even greater self-delusion and more toxic rants.”
A defeated Trump could be even more dangerous this year than he was in 2020, because the personal stakes for him are higher than ever: Trump is already a convicted felon, but if he wins, he can make many of the remaining criminal cases against him go away. If he loses, he faces not only personal humiliation but also a potential legal nightmare. This makes Trump a desperate man—and that desperation could drive his actions even after the final votes are cast.
Related:
- How Trump gets away with it
- Elon Musk says he would recognize a Harris election victory.
Here are four new stories from The Atlantic:
- Xochitl Gonzalez: “To save the world, my mother abandoned me.”
- Trump can’t deal with Harris’s success.
- Trump’s latest falsehood is a huge tell.
- A protest that’s drowning in its own tears
Today’s News
- Donald Trump will be interviewed by Elon Musk on X at 8 p.m. EST.
- Israel’s military is on high alert in anticipation of a possible response from Iran and Hezbollah to the killing of a Hamas leader in Tehran; U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin sent a guided-missile submarine to the region.
- Ukraine’s top military commander said that Kyiv controls 1,000 square kilometers of Russian territory, seven days into its incursion over the Russian border.
Dispatches
-
The Weekly Planet: As summers get hotter, public pools help people stay cool. Eve Andrews asks: Why are they so neglected?
- The Wonder Reader: Isabel Fattal explores the tricky links between our money and our mind.
Explore all of our newsletters here.
More From The Atlantic
- California’s fire-insurance crisis just got real.
- Why Kamala Harris’s politics are so hard to pin down
- How the gay-rights movement lost its way
Evening Read
Who Wants a ‘Man in Finance’?
By Christine Emba
This year’s “Song of the Summer” is highly contested; artists such as Kendrick Lamar, Charli XCX, and Sabrina Carpenter have been duking it out at the top of the charts. But an unexpected hit has emerged from TikTok. You may have heard it yourself:
“I’m looking for a man in finance. Trust fund. Six-five. Blue eyes.” Repeat, until the man himself appears—or the ghost of Andrea Dworkin rises up to roll her eyes.
Megan Boni, a video creator also known as Girl on Couch, shared the sample in April with a prescient caption: “Did I just write the song of the summer?” Her 19-second clip has gone on to collect nearly 60 million views and inspire hundreds of parodies and remixes—including by music-industry superstars such as Diplo and David Guetta …
In interviews, Boni has said that she made the song to poke fun at daters with extreme standards for potential partners. But whether or not it’s actually tongue in cheek, “Man in Finance” has taken off for a good reason. Its lyrics encapsulate two of the biggest trends at the core of modern heterosexual dating: the passing of the girlboss era and the unexpected return of vintage gender norms.
Read the full article.
Culture Break
Read. A new poem by Brad Walrond.
“we did not choose each other / on that underground Wednesday night / Harlem dance floor. / We were chosen.”
Watch. Good One, in theaters, is a deceptively simple, and unusually precise, coming-of-age film.
Play our daily crossword.
When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.
About the Author
Charles Sykes is the author of How the Right Lost Its Mind.
More Stories
The Trump Campaign Endorses a Racist TheoryThe Case Against Biden’s Supreme Court Proposal